Process Review
A fixed-scope review of one process. We map the work, design who does what with AI, test the design against cases where the AI is wrong, and hand over a plan your team or any builder can carry out.
Design one process so that it is clear what AI does, what people approve, and what happens when something goes wrong. Adding AI to an old process does not automatically improve it. Organisations need to decide which tasks AI can do, what people must check, who approves important actions, and what happens when the AI gets something wrong.
Start with one process, not the whole organisation.
Write down how the work is done today: each step, who does it, what information it uses, and which decision it ends in.
For each step, decide what the AI may do on its own, what it may only suggest, and what stays with a person. As AI does more of a step, the person’s part changes: first they do the work, then they check the AI’s work, and in time they may only approve it. Decide who checks at each stage, and give newer staff practice in checking, with an experienced colleague to discuss their decisions.
Name the point where a person checks the AI's work, what they check, and who signs off before anything leaves the team.
Run the process with a wrong or incomplete AI answer. See who notices, how quickly, and what it costs.
Agree before you start what will show that the new process works, for example errors caught, time taken or decisions reversed. Check it on a set date.
| Task | What the AI may do | What a person must check | Who signs off |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compare supplier quotes | Collect the quotes and build a comparison | That every quote covers the same work, and what the comparison left out | Category manager |
| Recommend a supplier | Rank suppliers on the agreed criteria | The evidence behind the ranking and the conditions in each contract | Budget holder |
| Flag unusual invoices | Mark invoices that differ from the contract | Each flagged invoice, before any payment is stopped | Finance or compliance owner |
Some AI tools now act, not only advise. They send messages, update records or place orders. A process that uses an AI agent needs four more answers.
The checks should match the consequence. An agent that drafts a reply needs fewer checks than an agent that pays a supplier.
A fixed-scope review of one process. We map the work, design who does what with AI, test the design against cases where the AI is wrong, and hand over a plan your team or any builder can carry out.
A working session with your leaders on one process you plan to change with AI. We go through the five steps together. Your team writes a map of who does what, where a person checks, and who signs off.
The people who check AI work need practice. Programmes for teams and business functions include Team Decisions with AI, AI in Operations and Supply Chain and AI Governance for Boards.
Yes, one process at a time, in a Process Review, with the people who do the work. If you would rather redesign it yourselves, the briefing teaches your team the method. AIR APAC does not build software or set up AI agents. Exeter Labs, the product company of AIR APAC, can do that under a separate agreement, or you can use any other supplier.
No. The five steps apply to any AI tool, from a chat assistant to an agent that acts on its own.
AIR APAC certifies these organisations to deliver its Process programmes and reviews to their clients.




Process
Tell us which process you plan to change with AI, who owns it today, and when you want to start.